Showing posts with label patent claim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patent claim. Show all posts

Apple and HTC fighting for their position in US

For two years, Apple Inc. has told the world that phones running on Google Inc.’s Android operating system are iPhone rip-offs. Now Apple is about to learn whether a U.S. trade agency thinks its claims have merit.

The International Trade Commission is set to rule Dec. 14 in a patent complaint lodged by Apple against rival smartphone maker HTC Corp. The decision, postponed from the original date of Tuesday, would mark the first final verdict from any judicial entity in Apple’s global patent war against HTC and fellow Android-phone makers Samsung Electronics Co. and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc.

A ruling for Apple may lead to a ban on U.S. imports of HTC devices, derailing the Taoyuan, Taiwan-based company’s trajectory from a small contract manufacturer founded in 1997 to the biggest U.S. smartphone seller in the third quarter. A victory for HTC may help it secure favorable terms in any settlement with Apple.
impact of apple patent claim against htc
“In the past two years, HTC has emerged essentially from obscurity by promoting their own brand and high-end phones, and they’ve largely been able to do this by leveraging Android,” said Alex Spektor, an analyst with Strategy Analytics Inc.

HTC generated about US$5-billion in U.S. sales last year, according to a separate patent complaint it filed at the trade agency against Cupertino, Calif.-based Apple. That’s more than half of HTC’s $9.1-billion in global 2010 sales.

HTC sold 24% of the smartphones in the U.S. during the third quarter, ahead of Samsung’s 21% and Apple’s 20%, Canalys reported Oct. 31. The Android platform accounts for almost 70% of the U.S. smartphone market, the Palo Alto, California-based researcher said. There were 120.4 million smartphones worldwide in the third quarter, a 49% jump from the year-ago period, Canalys said.

HTC’s Android phones, introduced in 2008, infuriated Steve Jobs, according to Walter Isaacson’s biography of the late Apple founder. Jobs made it his mission “to destroy Android,” which he said “ripped off the iPhone, wholesale,” according to the book.

Apple contends that HTC’s Android phones infringe four Apple patents, including one for a system to detect telephone numbers in e-mails so they can be stored in directories or called without dialing the numbers. The commission is reviewing an agency judge’s findings that HTC infringed that patent and one covering the transmission of multiple types of data, along with two other Apple patents that the judge said weren’t infringed.

The case is one of about a dozen before the commission related to the dispute over Android devices. Microsoft is fighting with Motorola Mobility and Barnes & Noble Inc., while Apple has legal disputes with HTC, Samsung and Motorola Mobility around the world.

A federal judge in San Francisco denied Apple’s request to halt sales of Samsung’s Infuse 4 and Galaxy S 4G phones and its Galaxy 10.1 tablet while a patent case is pending. The judge found that Apple was likely to win on some infringement claims, while Samsung had raised “substantial questions” of invalidity of two of the four patents in the case. The judge still said Apple didn’t show it would be irreparably harmed by Samsung remaining on the market until the July trial.

Apple also has patent-infringement suits pending against HTC in district court, though the trade agency tends to move more quickly.

An Apple victory would mark the second setback for HTC in two weeks at the agency. On Nov. 21, the commission rejected an agency judge’s findings that Apple was violating the patent rights of HTC’s S3 Graphics unit. HTC agreed to buy S3 Graphics for $300-million in July after the judge said Apple was infringing two S3 Graphics patents for video compression.

The commission is an independent agency set up to protect U.S. markets from unfair trade practices. It has the power to block imports of products found to infringe intellectual property rights.

HTC has said it has “alternative solutions in place” to work around the patents if a violation is found.

T-Mobile USA Inc., the fourth-largest U.S. wireless provider, said in an Oct. 6 filing with the trade agency that it has much to lose should there be any limit on HTC phones.

“An ever-increasing majority of T-Mobile’s U.S. customers prefer the Android platform and would be unable to purchase adequate substitutes in the near-term if HTC’s Android smartphones were excluded,” T-Mobile, a unit of Deutsche Telekom AG, said in the filing.

T-Mobile teamed with Google and HTC to sell the first Android phone in the U.S. in September 2008, and a majority of its current smartphone sales are devices made by HTC.

Google, which denies copying the iPhone and hasn’t been named in any of the trade agency complaints, argued in a filing that Apple is trying to control the U.S. smartphone market through litigation. HTC’s Android devices “are helping prevent Apple’s iOS from becoming the sole viable mobile platform and thus ‘locking in’ consumers and software developers to that platform,” Google said in the filing.

Apple has argued that it’s not trying to exclude all rival smartphones, only those using Apple inventions without permission.

“Apple is an American company that has poured billions of dollars in research and development and other investments into the U.S. economy,” Apple wrote in an Oct. 17 filing with the agency. “HTC is a foreign company that is free-riding on Apple’s research and development expenditures and resulting patents rather than creating its own innovations.”

There’s no guarantee that the commission will ban the HTC phones should it find that HTC violated Apple’s patents.

Neither T-Mobile nor Google took a position on the infringement issue, focusing instead on the possible import ban. T-Mobile said an exclusion order may undermine efforts to spread the newest generation of phones, known as 4G, even as the Obama administration favors expanding wireless high-speed Internet service into rural areas.

The Bellevue, Washington-based company, which doesn’t sell the iPhone, said it operates “America’s largest 4G network.”

The trade agency’s staff, which acts as a third party on behalf of the public in certain cases, has said that an exclusion order is “unlikely to have any significant impact on the public interest” and demand for smartphones could be met by other companies, including Apple.

It does recommend a limited exception for 4G phones. HTC accounts for more than half of all 4G sales in the U.S., so the company should be allowed to continue to bring in those phones for six months until additional competitors enter the market, the staff recommended.

HTC isn’t expected to retain its top spot in smartphone sales this quarter. On Nov. 23, the company cut its fourth- quarter revenue forecast, citing the weak global economy and competition from Apple and Samsung.

Apple has begun selling the iPhone 4, and Samsung’s newest Galaxy has become its best-selling phone ever, said Spektor of Strategy Analytics. At the same time, Sprint Nextel Corp., one of HTC’s customers, has begun selling the iPhone. Another loss at the trade agency would further undermine HTC’s position, Spektor said.

“The last thing they need is for a non-competitive factor to come into play,” said Spektor, who is based in Newton, Massachusetts. “HTC’s competitors in the Android space would be happy because the Android slice of the pie is less crowded.”
Source: Brothersoft News

Microsoft files one after another patent suits against Android

A senior Microsoft attorney says the number of patent lawsuits filed between tech companies is natural because of U.S. patent laws, suggesting the company will likely continue its legal attack on Google's Android system. Horacio Gutierrez, deputy general counsel for Microsoft, told the San Francisco Chronicle patent protections are a necessary part of the industry. Microsoft has already patented several "features that just make the phone much more efficient," for which Android makers should compensate Microsoft, according to Gutierrez.

Microsoft's strong stance comes as it signs licensing agreements with HTC and Samsung, generating more revenue from those arrangements than it makes from its own Windows Phone operating system.

result of patent claim by microsoft aginst google android

These agreements are often the goal of patent-related legal actions, and most companies would rather come to licensing agreements rather than halt the production of the devices due to bans and injunctions. But the rise of patent lawsuits has escalated of late, prompting debate over the effects on innovation and reform of the patent system.

Gutierrez denied, however, that Microsoft is waging a vendetta against Android, saying patent battles often happen when "technologies are really disruptive."

Gutierrez says the rise is unique to this time and place and that the U.S. patent system isn't in need or a reboot.

"People who lived in that particular time would look and say, 'What a mess, we certainly must live in the worst time. The system is broken and something has to be done to fix it,'" he said. "That's the situation we're in right now. If you think of a mobile phone or a tablet computer today, they're not your father's or your grandfather's cell phone."

One proposed remedy, the America Invents Act, attempts to clean up patent regulation by granting intellectual property rights on a first-filed, rather than first-invented basis.
Source: Brothersoft News

Samsung prepare to hit back next iPhone at homeland

Relation between Apple and Samsung is getting worse day by day. Currently, there are over 20 lawsuits between Apple and Samsung in progress and the fight has been going on since April of this year. Samsung is supposedly preparing a patent suit against Apple that should ban the next-gen iPhone sales in Korea. This was shared by a senior Samsung executive, wishing to remain anonymous, with The Korea Times.
iphone 5 release date
The soon-to-be patent suit will involve Samsung's wireless technology patents, which will supposedly be used by Apple in their next iPhone. Apparently the Korean manufacturer is sure that the Cupertino-based company will not be able to find a workaround for the issue. The unnamed exec reportedly shared this, as well:
For as long as Apple does not drop mobile telecommunications functions, it would be impossible for it to sell its i-branded products without using our patents. We will stick to a strong stance against Apple during the lingering legal fights.
It's a very specific statement, that's for sure. Apple drew first blood with the nation-wide German ban on the Galaxy Tab 10.1 sales. Though the effect might not be as great as they hoped. Then the removal of the Galaxy Tab 7.7 from the IFA trade show and a sales delay for the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia, following an injunction there.

Perhaps Samsung is now taking an attacking stance. A suggestion backed up by the counter-claim filled by the company in Australia, accusing Apple of infringing on 7 wireless patents, related to the iPhone and iPad.

The statement also says that the patents Apple used in their claims against Samsung, concerning the Galaxy Tab 10.1 were invalid. Apple has yet to comment on those statements.
Source | Via

Can Android Survive the Apple Lawsuits?

Apple has been stepping up its spate of lawsuits against every manufacturer even contemplating using Android in any of their products, with lawsuits against HTC, Samsung and Motorola already underway. Apple has succeeded in having Samsung tablets pulled from sale in Australia and the EU, and seeks to do the same with Motorola's Xoom.

Although the onslaught against Samsung is down solely to design (i.e. rectangular shaped tablets and colorful interface icons) many of Apple's lawsuits are due to alleged patent infringement by Android manufacturers. Apple's real enemy here is Android – they feel threatened by the Google OS' increasing market share in the smartphone arena and are clutching at any means necessary to destroy it entirely.

impacts of apple lawsuit over samsung android

In this game of patent litigation one method of covering your own back is to have a good set of patents under your wing. This is probably the main motivation behind Google's $12.5 billion acquisition of Motorola Mobility, which should provide Google with a wealth of patents to use as a bargaining chip against Apple in future lawsuits. But this move may cause much harm to Google's relationship with its hardware partners.

Motorola is a major producer of Android smartphones and there is some concern among other Android phone manufacturers that future Google produced Motorola phones will have an unfair advantage. Although the bosses at HTC, Samsung and Sony Ericsson have all publicly stated their support to the Google takeover of Motorola and despite Google's instance that Motorola will be operated as a separate company, there is no doubt some cause for concern here.

Samsung, one of the most successful companies to make use of Android, is reportedly stepping up its production of Bada based phones and is also looking into the possibility of purchasing WebOS from HP. Bada is a proprietary operating system developed by Samsung that runs on cheaper touchscreen phones released by the company, while its more expensive range run on Android. The purchase of WebOS could provide Samsung with an alternative to using Android should Google make any serious moves to become a key player in the smartphone hardware market. They could also use WebOS as the basis for a Samsung produced OS to compete with Android and iOS.

It would be a shame to see Samsung depart from the Android market, as they have produced some of the finest Android products of recent years – including the fantastic Galaxy S2 and various Galaxy Tab tablets. With so many lawsuits being directed towards Samsung due to its support of Android, and even the South Korean government urging the tech giant to move away from Google's operating system, it seems highly probable that Samsung would look to at least partially move towards other interfaces.

With Samsung jumping ship it is easy to imagine smaller companies also abandoning Android – companies that have not enjoyed nearly as much success with Android as Samsung has. If these other manufacturers do in fact stop their production of Android phones it will force Google to do what they have stated they have no intention of doing – move further into producing a more coherent hardware-software smartphone business in the same vein as Apple. If this eventuality transpires we could in all likelihood see Google-Motorola being the sole producer of Android phones in just a few years' time.

While the Motorola Droid and its follow ups were excellent devices, Google's own branded phones have never produced much of an impact. It also remains to be seen whether Google could produce a phone as awesome as the Samsung Galaxy S2 and so if Google became the sole producer of Android phones Apple may indeed achieve their aims of stopping Android market domination. For this reason it is advisable to pick up some Samsung Galaxy S2 deals while they are still available, before Apple has it pulled from the shelves. Hopefully with Steve Jobs out of the picture Apple may take a different direction, relying less on lawsuits on more on innovation to win back its market share. This may be the only way we will continue to see excellent Android phones from the likes of Samsung and HTC.
This post is written by Simon who is a guest author from best-mobile-contracts.co.uk.

Google Purchases 1,000 Patents from IBM

Patent is the single most discussed topic in the mobile arena for the last couple of months. Google, facing a growing threat of intellectualproperty lawsuits, purchased over 1,000 patents from International Business Machines (IBM) to bolster its portfolio. The high stakes is indicative of how important patent litigation is thought to be in the ongoing battle for smartphone and tablet platforms. It's not known exactly how the IBM patents will help. Some of the patents relate to the manufacture of CPU and memory chips which suggests an Android defence use. The patents cover a wide range of topics like fabrication and architecture of memory and microprocessing chips. Patents related to servers, routers, relational databases and object oriented programming have also been purchased by Google.

Google did not disclose how much it paid for the patents or whether or not it was in response to the mountain of lawsuits the Android is facing. "Like many tech companies, at times we'll acquire patents that are relevant to our business needs," Google said in a statement.
Source: Brothersoft News

Patent Law Threatens Mobile App Developers

Till now mobile related patent lawsuit are playing in the court of mobile phone and os manufacturers. But now the scene is going to change. Early this week both Apple and Android released figures regarding their app stores. Apple App Store has 425,000 apps and Android Market has 250,000 apps. App Store is now used by 200 million people and Android Market is used by 135 million people. But the future of developers is not as bright as we thought.

Apple has already reached a total of 15 billion app downloads to date. It currently has 425,000 apps available to more than 200 million users. Android confirmed that it had already reached 6 billion app downloads. The android app market has 250,000 apps available to the more 135 million android devices worldwide. But it is not all rosy for those developing this huge amount of apps. Continuous patent lawsuit have a devastating effect on the app industry. A growing number of app developers are choosing not to sell their products in the U.S. market. Developers are being left unprotected from the threat of legal action with both Apple and Google accepting no responsibility to represent its developers. It is these developers that create brand value and loyalty for mobile operating systems.

Lodsys, a patent company, has been wreaking havoc across both iOS and Android platforms in the U.S. Many developers have fled the U.S. to the European market. A developer based in Scotland stated that he was "starting to get seriously concerned about my future as a software developer due to these patent issues". In an interview with the Guardian another developer added that it was "far too dangerous to do business in the US because of the risk of software patent lawsuits". Those developers based in the U.S. are worse off, in particular those already on Lodsys’s hit list.

So, as growth in the app industry is being restrained by patent lawsuits, should operating software providers do more to support those within their developer network? While competition to attract developers remains so intense surely the likes of Apple and Google will put forward some form of a proposal to protect or negotiate on behalf of their developers. Even the offer of some legal support would prove helpful to those threatened by legal action. Lets not say financial support, but at least some fundamental guidance. Admittedly this will not eradicate the threat. To be frank the threat is not just going to disappear.

Possibly the formation of some kind of developers alliance or union could help resolve the issue. It would mean that licenses could be purchased by many developers as a single entity. The cost could be split between the union and big names such as Apple and Android. Obviously developers would have to join the alliance as members to be entitled to benefit from any agreement. It would allow for responsibility to shared across developers and operating software developers. What’s more union would be able to represent developers in negotiating any agreements.

If such an arrangement could not be reached then life would become very difficult for developers. The likes of Android may have to put in place some type of regulation system that would ensure that developers are not infringement in the first place. It would mean closer communication between both sides to ensure developers are found liable. Again, it is all in the best interest of operating software producers as happy and content app developers bring the best out of any platform. In today’s smartphone orientated market apps play a crucial role, a operating system without an adequate app developer ecosystem simply cannot compete.number of android phone apps
Source: Brothersoft

Apple Filed New Lawsuit against HTC Androids

HTC after suing Samsung and Amazon, Apple has filed another lawsuit against the Taiwanese smartphone manufacturer HTC. Apple now indicating dozen of Android running mobile phone and Flyer tablet. Apple is aiming to block the sales of those Android devices it claims are infringing on Apple’s patents. Sales of HTC phones are huge in last 2 years. In April 2011, the company's market value surpassed that of Nokia to become the third largest smartphone maker in the world, only behind Apple and Samsung, which make it to become the biggest rival of Apple. So it is clear that because of the fear to Android, and as the biggest Android smartphone manufacturer Apple is doing this to protect their US market.

The patents in question are the same ones that are used in another complaint against Samsung – patents for scrolling operations, programmable tactile touch-screen displays, a double-sided touch-sensitive panel, a patent for scrolling, zooming and rotating content on a screen, and one that concerns portable computers. While all the today's mobile phone have all these functions. Is there any other way to do so? In Apple’s mind, the rivals’ devices are much better than the iPhone, especially Samsung’s Galaxy II smartphone and HTC’s Sensation, plus their tablets are good enough to make a huge impact to Apple’s iPad 2. Due to its fears for HTC and Android, Apple is now going after everybody, it sure sounds like it wants to be the only smartphone manufacturer left standing when the dust settles.
what is the effect of apple patent lawsuit
Apple is not shy about dragging its competitors before the ITC over patent disputes again and again. It would be an absolute shame if the strongest competitor to the iPhone was barred from the U.S. for having some OS similarities. People would rather see Apple win the mobile war by offering a better product, not a better legal strategy. But i think it is not possible to block Android in US or other place. Because people love it!
Source: Brothersoft

 
Design by Wordpress Theme | Bloggerized by Free Blogger Templates | coupon codes